| |
BACK
Quarterly forecasts of the economic development of Poland
(October 2001)
[This forecast was prepared for and is published courtesy of Reuters Polska.]
Economic developments during the third quarter of 2001 made a risk of the
recession bigger. Firstly, the external environment for the Polish economy
seriously deteriorated, as the world economy suffered a major slow-down
accompanied by adverse effects of the terrorist attack against the USA.
Secondly, the fiscal crisis in Poland appeared much more serious that previously
feared. Thirdly, the unclear political and economic situation did not allow the
central bank to relax the monetary policy. Fourthly, the contraction of the
investment demand appeared deeper than we previously assumed. Therefore, Poland
enters a very dangerous period during which a tough fiscal adjustment program,
necessary to stabilize the budget and to rebuild the confidence of the financial
markets, will be most likely realized in the conditions of the shrinking tax
base, falling dynamics of exports, and lack of sufficient cooperation and
support from the monetary authority. The negative short-term effects of the
major fiscal tightening are not likely to be compensated neither by the monetary
expansion nor by the export boom. Therefore, the growth prospects for the
domestic absorption and GDP look very bleak. According to our view, Poland may
avoid the contraction of output, but the growth in the next year is unlikely to
exceed 1-1.5%, with the unemployment growing to almost 20%. On the other hand,
we expect that the strength of the Zloty, currently on the unsustainable level,
will be corrected by the market. A weaker currency will not help a lot
exporters, but will make the achievement of the medium-term monetary policy
target of 4% CPI inflation in 2003 all but impossible..
Two positive factors that should be noted include the likely acceleration of
the negotiations with the EU, making the accession as early as 2004 quite
possible, and further decrease of the current account deficit. Both phenomena,
however, will have a medium-term meaning and will not help Poland to cope with
the current economic problems in 2002.
The economic growth in the first three quarters of 2001 was characterized by
the following factors:
- The domestic absorption contracted, mainly due to the sharp fall in
investment activities. In our view, such a slowdown can not be explained
just by the high level of real interest rates, but reflects also the growing
uncertainty about the medium-term development prospects, and about the
social and economic stability, that led to the slowdown in both the domestic
and foreign investment. Therefore, rebuilding the confidence of the markets
is the first task of the new government.
- The improvement in the balance of payments continued, with the current
account deficit going down to below 5% of GDP. Obviously, under the exchange
rate regime of the pure float such a decrease is just a reflection of the
slowdown in capital inflows. However, one should also note the remarkable
export performance of the Polish firms, and a sharp deceleration of the
demand for imports.
- The real exchange rate of the Zloty remained at a very high level. A
phenomenon of the weak real economy and strong currency can be explained by
the adverse effects of the macroeconomic policy mix, with the loose fiscal
policy and overly tight monetary policy. Extremely high real interest rates
still attract the portfolio capital, although the growing risk makes the
horizon for investment shorter.
- The fiscal crisis continued, with no adequate reaction of the former
government. Delay in the fiscal adjustment program enhanced the general
uncertainty about the financial stability of Poland.
The outlook for 2001 looks rather gloomy. The unfavourable policy mix, in
particular the restrictive monetary policy accompanying the fiscal tightening
will lead to continuation of the low investment demand, reducing the growth rate
of GDP to ca. 1% in the first half of 2002. The disinflation process, quite
remarkable in 2001, will be probably temporarily reversed by the serious
devaluation of the currency. We expect that Zloty may lose as much as 15% of its
value vis-à-vis the major world currencies during the first half of 2002. The
biggest worry, however, will be unemployment growing to almost 20% by the end of
the year, even if some acceleration of the GDP growth appears.
TABLE ONE. POLISH GDP – pct change vs pvs period |
|
Quarterly data and forecast |
Yearly data and forecast |
|
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
Q3 (est.) |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q1-Q4 |
Q1-Q4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP Total |
1,1 |
1,0 |
1,3 |
1,0 |
1,1 |
1.3 |
(2,6) |
1.4 |
(3.2) |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal consumption |
2,5 |
2,6 |
1,9 |
1,8 |
1,5 |
2,1 |
(1,4) |
1,8 |
(2.9) |
Government consumption |
0,5 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
-0,1 |
-0,1 |
0,4 |
(0,2) |
-0,1 |
(1.2) |
Gross fixed capital formation |
-11,0 |
-7,7 |
-6,8 |
-1,0 |
3,6 |
-7,2 |
(1,3) |
1.4 |
(4.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports |
8,9 |
7,4 |
4,8 |
3,1 |
2,5 |
9,4 |
(9,2) |
3,4 |
(5.4) |
Imports |
2,1 |
0,2 |
1,0 |
2,8 |
3,9 |
2,7 |
(3,7) |
3,3 |
(4,2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account as % of GDP |
|
|
|
|
|
-4,3 |
(-5,1) |
-4,4 |
(-6,1) |
Registered unemployment as % of labour supply |
|
|
|
|
|
17,4 |
(17,2) |
19,5 |
(17.7) |
Budget deficit as % of GDP (excluding privatization) |
|
|
|
|
|
-4,1 |
(-4,0) |
-5,0 |
(-3.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Growth rates presented measure GDP growth in
quarters in relation to corresponding figures noted year ago. The column
Q1-Q4 is an estimate for a calendar year; previous estimate in brackets. |
|
Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies |
|
TABLE TWO. CPI, PPI INFLATION |
|
Data |
Forecast |
|
2001 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months CPI inflation |
4,3 |
4,5 |
(5.3) |
4,6 |
6,6 |
6,5 |
12 months PPI inflation |
0,6 |
0,5 |
(1.1) |
0,5 |
3,4 |
4,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zloty/US$ exchange rate (eop) |
4,22 |
4,26 |
(4.18) |
4,90 |
4,83 |
4,84 |
Zloty/Euro exchange rate (eop) |
3,85 |
3,91 |
(3.64) |
4,51 |
4,58 |
4,64 |
Lombard rate |
18,5 |
17,0 |
(17.5) |
15,0 |
16,0 |
16,0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Figures for end of period; previous estimate in
brackets. |
Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies |
|