| |
BACK
Quarterly forecasts of the economic development of Poland (July 2002)
[This forecast was prepared for and is published courtesy of
Reuters Polska.]
Economic outcome of the first half of 2002 was slightly better than we
previously forecasted, mainly due to the better than expected export
performance. However, the general picture was very close to our projections: the
real economy was very week, mainly due to the weak domestic demand, inflation
remained fully under control, and the current account deficit did not change
significantly. Starting from April, the mild
process of the correction of the Zloty exchange rate took place (until July Złoty
lost ca. 10% of its value vis-à-vis the basket of currencies).
Such a weakening, fully in line with our expectations, should not seriously
influence the inflationary pressure being offset by very low prices of food and
fuels.
We maintain our view that the Polish economy probably bottomed up during the
second quarter of 2002, and the growth should significantly accelerate over the
next 4 quarters. Initially, the accelerated growth will result mainly from the
low base effect – the deep fall of the investment demand, causing the
economic slowdown, started only during the second quarter of 2001, and continued
throughout 4-5 quarters. However, we tend to believe that over the next quarters
the low base effect will be gradually substituted by the actual economic growth,
steadily pushing the GDP growth figures up. Several factors should contribute to
this effect:
- Personal consumption remains relatively strong, fuelled – despite
the high unemployment – by steadily growing real wages. During the
months to come we also expect the higher dynamics of the capital income of
households, accompanying the faster growth of output and rising corporate
profits.
- Some early signals indicate the possible acceleration of the investment
demand. This factor is absolutely crucial for the growth prospects of
Poland, as it is mainly the fall of investment demand that caused the
economic slow-down of the country. Among reasons behind the projected
acceleration one should note: the lagged effect of the interest rates cuts,
progress in the fiscal stabilization, fast advancement in the EU accession
negotiations, and the general improvement in the business confidence. That
should also lead to the gradual increase in the FDI inflows.
- The growth of the government consumption will remain relatively slow,
albeit faster than we previously expected. In our view, additional budgetary
expenditures on the support for loss-making firms will be quite limited, and
will not significantly alter the path of the fiscal stabilization as
proposed by the previous Finance Minister Marek Belka.
- The external sector should not influence seriously the GDP growth. Rising
dynamics of the domestic demand, and particularly investment, should lead to
the acceleration of imports. Given poor (still) prospects of the recovery in
Germany, we do not expect the export performance to match the growth of
imports despite the weaker currency. Exports will accelerate only during the
year 2003. Therefore, we project the Polish current account deficit to
increase slightly, in line with the growing FDI inflows.
Altogether, we expect the GDP growth to increase gradually to ca. 3% during
the first half of 2002. The further acceleration of the growth will be probably
accompanied by the apparent increase in the current account deficit, and rising
inflationary pressure. However, both phenomena should not reach dangerous levels
and most likely will not lead to tightening of the macroeconomic policy in 2003.
The inflation rate is likely to grow again over the next few quarters. The
unusually low level of consumer prices recorded during summer 2002 does not seem
to be sustainable if the domestic demand accelerates. Also the effects of the
weaker Złoty should be visible in a few months time. Nevertheless, unless some
unexpected increase in the world fuel prices occur, the general CPI index should
remain lower in the second half of 2002 than we previously expected.
TABLE ONE. POLISH GDP – pct change vs pvs period |
|
Quarterly data and forecast |
Yearly data and forecast |
|
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
|
Q2
(est.) |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q1-Q4 |
Q1-Q4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP Total |
0.8 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
1.1 |
(0.7) |
3.7 |
(3.5) |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal consumption |
3.4 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
(2.1) |
3.1 |
(2.9) |
Government consumption |
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
(0.1) |
1.1 |
(0.4) |
Gross fixed capital formation |
-7.8 |
3.1 |
6.6 |
6.7 |
6.5 |
-1.0 |
(-0.8) |
7.1 |
(6.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports |
0.5 |
0.3 |
2.6 |
4.8 |
6.1 |
1.1 |
(2.1) |
7.0 |
(6.9) |
Imports |
1.1 |
4.1 |
6.6 |
6.7 |
6.8 |
3.5 |
(3.3) |
6.8 |
(6.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account as % of GDP |
|
|
|
|
|
-4.3% |
(-4.1%) |
-4.8% |
(-4.8%) |
Registered unemployment as % of labour supply |
17.3 |
18.6 |
19.4 |
19.5 |
19.3
20.4 |
19.4 |
(20.3) |
18.9 |
(19.8)
(19.8) |
Budget deficit as % of GDP (excluding privatization) |
|
|
|
|
|
-5.0% |
(-5.1%) |
-4.4% |
(-4.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Growth rates presented measure GDP growth in
quarters in relation to corresponding figures noted year ago. The column
Q1-Q4 is an estimate for a calendar year; previous estimate in brackets. |
Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies |
TABLE TWO. CPI, PPI INFLATION |
|
Data |
Forecast |
|
2002 |
2003 |
|
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months CPI inflation |
1.6 |
2.2 |
2.9 |
(5.1) |
3.0 |
3.2 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
(4.1) |
12 months PPI inflation |
1.1 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
(2.0) |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
(1.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zloty/US$ exchange rate (eop) |
4.02 |
4.22 |
4.29 |
(4.40) |
4.31 |
4.26 |
4.22 |
4.25 |
(4.19) |
Zloty/Euro exchange rate (eop) |
3.96 |
4.05 |
4.12 |
(4.02) |
4.17 |
4.19 |
4.20 |
4.23 |
(4.22) |
Lombard rate |
11.5 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
(12.5) |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.5 |
11.5 |
(10.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Figures for end of period; previous estimate in
brackets. |
Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies |
|