| |
BACK
Quarterly forecasts of the economic development of Poland
(July 2001)
[This forecast was prepared for and is published courtesy of
Reuters Polska.]
The economic performance of Poland in the second quarter of 2001 was much
worse than expected. The domestic absorption further contracted, as the low
dynamics of the consumer demand was accompanied by the falling fixed capital
formation. The net exports remained, as in the last quarters, the main driving
force behind continuing GDP growth. However, the extremely high level of the
real exchange rate of zloty, prevailing over the majority of 2001, led to the
serious deterioration of the profitability of exports. Continuation of this
trend will, sooner or later, lead to the slowdown in the export expansion,
particularly if combined with the weakening external demand. The current
economic situation was mainly due to the excessively restrictive monetary
policy. Doubts about the adequacy of the monetary policy restrictiveness to the
situation of a slowing down economy in the second half of 2000 and beginning of
2001 was further enhanced by the correction of the fiscal data for 2000, showing
much less of the public sector deficit than previously assumed. The current
fiscal problems, albeit serious, do not represent, in our view, any treat for
the macroeconomic stability. Moreover, the problems are, to a big degree, due to
the monetary policy-induced economic slowdown. Very high real interest rates,
combined with the strong real appreciation of the currency allowed for a
spectacular drop in inflation, at the price of freezing the domestic demand.
The economic growth in the second quarter of 2001 was characterized by the
following factors:
- The domestic absorption was shrinking. That was mainly due to the falling
investment demand, hurt by the restrictive monetary policy and by the
general deterioration of the perception of the short-term economic
prospects. The personal consumption dynamics was very low, due to the
sluggish growth of real wages and incomes.
- The export performance remained exceptional, particularly given the
strength of the currency. One should note, however, that according to all
the evidence the profitability of exports was falling. Moreover, due to the
natural lags, the exports in the second quarter of 2001 was linked to
contracts signed several months earlier, under the terms assuming much
weaker z這ty than in the mid-year.
- The imports were growing on a much slower path, mainly due to the falling
real domestic demand. As a result, the current account further improved.
- Altogether, GDP growth slowed down to below 1%. The domestic absorption
contracted, while the positive growth impact of the foreign trade continued.
The slow growth was accompanied by the unemployment rising to almost 16%.
- The CPI and PPI inflation were on the clearly deccelerating path, both due
to the economic slowdown, as well as the strong z這ty.
In the case of the PPI, the deflationary trend appeared, raising fears about
the possible prolonged industrial recession.
- The fiscal performance remained the main concern. The government was
forced to propose budget amendments increasing deficit, as overly optimistic
assumptions about the tax revenues did not materialize, partly – but
not exclusively – due to the slower than expected growth. However, we
do not see the higher fiscal deficit as a treat for the economic stability.
The scale of the expected deficit increase is rather modest (8 billion z這ty,
slightly above 1% of GDP), and the macroeconomic environment deflationary.
The outlook for the second half of 2001 is rather poor, although some
acceleration of the economic growth may take place. The consumer demand should
grow faster, partly due to the German compensation payments to the slave
workers. Given the long-term factors behind the investment demand, and in
particular the growing market competition, we do not expect the firms to cut
seriously the investment activity. Export performance may be hurt by the
slowdown in the major trading partners (mainly Germany). However, with the very
low dynamics of the domestic absorption, the Polish firms will be desperate to
sell goods abroad, even at the loss. Moreover, some weakening of the z這ty
in July 2001 slightly increased the profitability of export sales. All these
factors, combined with the slow increase in imports, should lead to some
acceleration of the GDP growth, possibly to ca.3%. The disinflation trend should
continue over the second half of 2001, with
a strong fall of the CPI inflation in July-August. The end-year CPI inflation
should be well below the NBP inflation target. However, the unavoidable
correction of the market value of the z這ty, that we expect in the last quarter
of 2001 or the first half of 2002, will push the inflation higher.
Our main conclusions about the likely outcome are as following:
1.· The dynamics of the domestic absorption will be very weak until
the end of 2001, accelerating only in 2002.
- Despite the strong z這ty and weakening
external demand, the export expansion will continue, albeit at a slower
path. The import demand will remain rather weak.
- As a result, the GDP growth in 2001 will reach ca. 2.4%, and may only
slightly improve in the second half of 2002.
- The industrial recession and undershooting the inflation target will force
NBP to relax its monetary policy. Moreover, the pressure to continue with
the relatively relaxed policy will be exerted by the new left-wing
government that will probably take over the power in October 2001. In such a
situation, we do not expect NBP to react strongly to the weakening of the z這ty
and the hike in inflation in 2002.
TABLE ONE. POLISH GDP – pct change vs pvs period |
|
Quarterly data and forecast |
Yearly data and forecast |
|
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
Q2 (est.) |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q1-Q4 |
Q1-Q4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP Total |
0.9 |
3.0 |
3.8 |
1.9 |
2.7 |
2.6 |
(3.8) |
3.2 |
(4.3) |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal consumption |
0.3 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
1.4 |
(3.1) |
2.9 |
(4.2) |
Government consumption |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
0.2 |
(1.0) |
1.2 |
(2.0) |
Gross fixed capital formation |
-1.7 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
3.5 |
1.3 |
(3.6) |
4.2 |
(6.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports |
10.0 |
8.3 |
7.0 |
5.1 |
4.2 |
9.2 |
(11.5) |
5.4 |
(6.6) |
Imports |
4.5 |
3.2 |
1.2 |
5.2 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
(9.6) |
4.2 |
(7.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account as % of GDP |
|
|
|
|
|
-5.1 |
(-5.6) |
-6.1 |
(-6.1) |
Registered unemployment as % of labour supply |
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
(16.9) |
17.7 |
(16.8) |
Budget deficit as % of GDP (excluding privatization) |
|
|
|
|
|
-4.0 |
(-2.7) |
-2.2 |
(-2.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Growth rates presented measure GDP growth in
quarters in relation to corresponding figures noted year ago. The column
Q1-Q4 is an estimate for a calendar year; previous estimate in brackets. |
|
Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies |
|
TABLE TWO. CPI, PPI INFLATION |
|
Data |
Forecast |
|
2000 |
2002 |
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months CPI inflation |
6.2 |
6.2 |
4.9 |
5.3 |
(5.5) |
6.3 |
6.6 |
12 months PPI inflation |
3.8 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
(3.1) |
1.9 |
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zloty/US$ exchange rate (eop) |
4.06 |
3.97 |
4.14 |
4.18 |
(4.13) |
4.50 |
4.53 |
Zloty/Euro exchange rate (eop) |
3.69 |
3.39 |
3.57 |
3.64 |
(3.89) |
3.92 |
4.07 |
Lombard rate |
21.0 |
19.5 |
18.5 |
17.5 |
(19.0) |
17.5 |
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Figures for end of period; previous estimate in
brackets. |
Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies |
|