BACK
Quarterly forecasts of the economic development of Poland
(April 2001)
[This forecast was prepared for and is published courtesy of Reuters Polska.]
Economic developments during the first quarter of 2001 were very close to
what we expected. The economy was in the state of serious slowdown, due to the
sluggish domestic demand. The good export performance continued, leading,
together with the much slower growth of demand for imports, to the continuous
improvement in the balance of payments. The fall of the current account deficit
below 6% of GDP, down from 8.3% 12 months ago, seriously reduced any risk of the
foreign exchange crisis. Despite the progress in stabilization of the economy,
NBP was very reluctant in cutting interest rates (the cuts in real interest
rates were only slightly deeper then we forecasted). High interest rates, in
turn, contributed to the slow growth, and created incentives for the enhanced
portfolio capital inflows, leading to strengthening of Zloty. The inflationary
pressure eased and disinflation trend returned, partly due to the very strong
Zloty, and partly due to the weak domestic demand.
Some indicator suggest that the domestic demand growth bottomed down during
the fourth quarter of 2000 and first quarter of 2001. Raising real demand for
credit, some pickup in real wages, and expected transfer payments from the
government should contribute to the faster growth of expenditures in the second
half of the year. Nevertheless, the macroeconomic policy faces serious
challenges. The budget deficit is likely to exceed the 2001 target, mainly due
to the revenue shortfall caused by the economic slowdown. That makes deep
interest rates cuts quite unlikely, despite the excessive tightness of the
monetary policy. Strong Zloty and deteriorating external environment will
probably lead to the slowdown in export expansion. With the moderate pickup in
the import demand that should lead the current account improvement to the halt.
The economic slowdown may become longer and more profound than we previously
assumed. The GDP growth rate will not exceed 5% level before 2003, and the
unemployment will reach at least 17%.
The economic growth in the first quarter of 2001 was characterized by the
following factors:
- The rate of growth of the domestic absorption did not change compared to
the end of 2000, and reached 1.6%. This was a result of the continuing
slowdown in the consumer demand, eroded in the second half of 2000 by
adverse price shocks and rising unemployment, and by the low dynamics of
investment due to the tight monetary policy.
- As a result of the budget uncertainties, and in particular of the fast
accumulation of the deficit, the central bank increased the level of
restrictiveness of the monetary policy, both through the high real interest
rates and appreciating currency, despite clear signals about the economic
slowdown, falling current account deficit, and reduced inflation.
- The external balance of the economy continued to improve, as the fast
increase in exports was accompanied by the relatively low import demand. The
real appreciation of the currency was compensated by strong productivity
gains, partly achieved due to the cuts in employment.
- Altogether, as a result of the slow increase of the domestic absorption
combined with the strong positive growth contribution from the net exports
the growth rate of GDP was stable at ca. 2.8%. At the current level of
inflexibility of the labour market such a GDP dynamics led to the further
increase in the unemployment rate to 16%.
The outlook for 2001 looks rather gloomy. The unfavourable policy mix, in
particular the excessively restrictive monetary policy will lead to continuation
of the low investment demand, reducing the growth rate of GDP to below 4% in
2001 and slowing down the process of modernization of the economy. However, as
the political agenda makes an improvement in the fiscal policy quite improbable
neither in 2001 nor in 2002, the Monetary Policy Council will be quite reluctant
in cutting the nominal rates. The biggest worry is the rising unemployment that
we project at over 17% at the beginning of 2002 Only a radical deregulation of
the labour market could stop the process. Unfortunately, given the political
agenda, we do not think that such a move is likely to happen in 2001.
The improvement in the external equilibrium will come to the end by the
mid-2001, and the current account deficit will stabilize between 5.5 and 6% of
GDP. That will be mainly due to the strong Złoty,
a product of the stabilization of the economy, high interest rates and the
flexible exchange rate regime. In our view, Złoty is currently overvaluated by
10-15% vis-à-vis euro. However, we do not expect the accelerated
depreciation before 2002.
The CPI inflation rate, after a spectacular fall in the first quarter, should
stabilize or even increase in the second quarter. The rate should fall again to
ca. 5.5% during the summer of 2001, as a result of low food prices, strong
currency, and weak domestic demand. However, we expect the further progress in
disinflation very difficult, particularly if Złoty
significantly depreciates in 2002.
TABLE ONE. POLISH GDP – pct change vs pvs period |
|
Quarterly data and forecast |
Yearly data and forecast |
|
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
Q1 (est.) |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q1-Q4 |
Q1-Q4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP Total |
2.8 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
4.8 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
(4.2) |
4.3 |
|
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal consumption |
1.6 |
2.7 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
3.1 |
(3.2) |
4.2 |
|
Government consumption |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
(1.0) |
2.0 |
|
Gross fixed capital formation |
1.7 |
2.5 |
3.6 |
5.1 |
5.4 |
3.6 |
(2.3) |
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports |
16.5 |
13.7 |
9.0 |
7.1 |
6.3 |
11.5 |
(12.8) |
6.6 |
|
Imports |
9.2 |
9.3 |
9.7 |
10.1 |
10.2 |
9.6 |
(7.3) |
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account as % of GDP |
|
|
|
|
|
-5.6 |
(-5.4) |
-6.1 |
|
Registered unemployment as % of labour supply |
15.9 |
16.0 |
16.3 |
16.9 |
17.3 |
16.9 |
(16.5) |
16.8 |
|
Budget deficit as % of GDP (excluding privatization) |
|
|
|
|
|
-2.7 |
(-1.9) |
-2.5 |
|
|
NOTE: Growth rates presented measure GDP growth in
quarters in relation to corresponding figures noted year ago. The column
Q1-Q4 is an estimate for a calendar year; previous estimate in brackets. |
Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies |
TABLE TWO. CPI, PPI INFLATION |
|
Data |
Forecast |
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
6.2 |
6.0 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
(6.2) |
5.1 |
12 months PPI inflation |
5.6 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
3.1 |
(3.2) |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zloty/US$ exchange rate (eop) |
4.31 |
4.06 |
4.04 |
4.08 |
4.13 |
(4.06) |
4.21 |
Zloty/Euro exchange rate (eop) |
3.88 |
3.70 |
3.67 |
3.72 |
3.89 |
(4.14) |
4.08 |
Lombard rate |
23.0 |
21.0 |
21.0 |
20.0 |
19.0 |
(20.0) |
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N O TE: Figures for end of period; previous
estimate in brackets. |
Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies |
|