BACK    

Quarterly forecasts of the economic development of Poland  (April 2001)
[This forecast was prepared for and is published courtesy of Reuters Polska.]

Economic developments during the first quarter of 2001 were very close to what we expected. The economy was in the state of serious slowdown, due to the sluggish domestic demand. The good export performance continued, leading, together with the much slower growth of demand for imports, to the continuous improvement in the balance of payments. The fall of the current account deficit below 6% of GDP, down from 8.3% 12 months ago, seriously reduced any risk of the foreign exchange crisis. Despite the progress in stabilization of the economy, NBP was very reluctant in cutting interest rates (the cuts in real interest rates were only slightly deeper then we forecasted). High interest rates, in turn, contributed to the slow growth, and created incentives for the enhanced portfolio capital inflows, leading to strengthening of Zloty. The inflationary pressure eased and disinflation trend returned, partly due to the very strong Zloty, and partly due to the weak domestic demand.

Some indicator suggest that the domestic demand growth bottomed down during the fourth quarter of 2000 and first quarter of 2001. Raising real demand for credit, some pickup in real wages, and expected transfer payments from the government should contribute to the faster growth of expenditures in the second half of the year. Nevertheless, the macroeconomic policy faces serious challenges. The budget deficit is likely to exceed the 2001 target, mainly due to the revenue shortfall caused by the economic slowdown. That makes deep interest rates cuts quite unlikely, despite the excessive tightness of the monetary policy. Strong Zloty and deteriorating external environment will probably lead to the slowdown in export expansion. With the moderate pickup in the import demand that should lead the current account improvement to the halt. The economic slowdown may become longer and more profound than we previously assumed. The GDP growth rate will not exceed 5% level before 2003, and the unemployment will reach at least 17%.

The economic growth in the first quarter of 2001 was characterized by the following factors:

  1. The rate of growth of the domestic absorption did not change compared to the end of 2000, and reached 1.6%. This was a result of the continuing slowdown in the consumer demand, eroded in the second half of 2000 by adverse price shocks and rising unemployment, and by the low dynamics of investment due to the tight monetary policy.
  2. As a result of the budget uncertainties, and in particular of the fast accumulation of the deficit, the central bank increased the level of restrictiveness of the monetary policy, both through the high real interest rates and appreciating currency, despite clear signals about the economic slowdown, falling current account deficit, and reduced inflation.
  3. The external balance of the economy continued to improve, as the fast increase in exports was accompanied by the relatively low import demand. The real appreciation of the currency was compensated by strong productivity gains, partly achieved due to the cuts in employment.
  4. Altogether, as a result of the slow increase of the domestic absorption combined with the strong positive growth contribution from the net exports the growth rate of GDP was stable at ca. 2.8%. At the current level of inflexibility of the labour market such a GDP dynamics led to the further increase in the unemployment rate to 16%.

The outlook for 2001 looks rather gloomy. The unfavourable policy mix, in particular the excessively restrictive monetary policy will lead to continuation of the low investment demand, reducing the growth rate of GDP to below 4% in 2001 and slowing down the process of modernization of the economy. However, as the political agenda makes an improvement in the fiscal policy quite improbable neither in 2001 nor in 2002, the Monetary Policy Council will be quite reluctant in cutting the nominal rates. The biggest worry is the rising unemployment that we project at over 17% at the beginning of 2002 Only a radical deregulation of the labour market could stop the process. Unfortunately, given the political agenda, we do not think that such a move is likely to happen in 2001.

The improvement in the external equilibrium will come to the end by the mid-2001, and the current account deficit will stabilize between 5.5 and 6% of GDP. That will be mainly due to the strong Złoty, a product of the stabilization of the economy, high interest rates and the flexible exchange rate regime. In our view, Złoty is currently overvaluated by 10-15% vis-à-vis euro. However, we do not expect the accelerated depreciation before 2002.

The CPI inflation rate, after a spectacular fall in the first quarter, should stabilize or even increase in the second quarter. The rate should fall again to ca. 5.5% during the summer of 2001, as a result of low food prices, strong currency, and weak domestic demand. However, we expect the further progress in disinflation very difficult, particularly if Złoty significantly depreciates in 2002.

 

TABLE ONE. POLISH GDP – pct change vs pvs period

 

Quarterly data and forecast

Yearly data and forecast

 

2001

2002

2001

2002

 

Q1 (est.)

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q1-Q4

Q1-Q4

 

                 

GDP Total

2.8

3.6

3.6

4.8

4.1

3.8

(4.2)

4.3

 

of which:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Personal consumption

1.6

2.7

3.9

4.2

4.1

3.1

(3.2)

4.2

 

Government consumption

0.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

2.0

1.0

(1.0)

2.0

 

Gross fixed capital formation

1.7

2.5

3.6

5.1

5.4

3.6

(2.3)

6.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exports

16.5

13.7

9.0

7.1

6.3

11.5

(12.8)

6.6

 

Imports

9.2

9.3

9.7

10.1

10.2

9.6

(7.3)

7.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Memo items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current account as % of GDP

 

 

 

 

 

-5.6

(-5.4)

-6.1

 

Registered unemployment as % of labour supply

15.9

16.0

16.3

16.9

17.3

16.9

(16.5)

16.8

 

Budget deficit as % of GDP (excluding privatization)

 

 

 

 

  

-2.7

(-1.9)

-2.5

 

 

NOTE: Growth rates presented measure GDP growth in quarters in relation to corresponding figures noted year ago. The column Q1-Q4 is an estimate for a calendar year; previous estimate in brackets.

Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE TWO. CPI, PPI INFLATION

 

Data

Forecast

 

2000

2001

2002

 

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

 

Q1

 

             
 

8.5

6.2

6.0

5.4

5.5

(6.2)

5.1

12 months PPI inflation

5.6

3.9

3.7

3.4

3.1

(3.2)

3.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Memo items:

       

 

   

Zloty/US$ exchange rate (eop)

4.31

4.06

4.04

4.08

4.13

(4.06)

4.21

Zloty/Euro exchange rate (eop)

3.88

3.70

3.67

3.72

3.89

(4.14)

4.08

Lombard rate

23.0

21.0

21.0

20.0

19.0

(20.0)

19.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 N O TE: Figures for end of period; previous estimate in brackets.

Source: NOBE Independent Center for Economic Studies